Windsurf vs Google Antigravity
Compare Windsurf and Google Antigravity by workflow, pricing, privacy, model support, and best use cases.
Details checked Jun 14, 2026
Windsurf
Choose Windsurf if you want an AI-first IDE that keeps agentic coding close to your editor, terminal, and project context; consider lighter extensions or CLI agents if you prefer a less opinionated workflow.
Google Antigravity
Choose Google Antigravity when you want a Gemini-native, agent-first development platform that can coordinate multiple agents across editor, terminal, browser, desktop, CLI, SDK, and Google Cloud workflows. Use a more local, open-source, or provider-neutral agent if model independence, local execution, or minimal platform coupling matters more.
Key Differences
Workflow
Windsurf, now transitioning under the Devin Desktop brand, is an AI-native IDE for developers who want coding agents, codebase context, and editor workflows in one desktop environment.
Google Antigravity is an agent-first AI development platform that combines a desktop agent manager, IDE, CLI, SDK, and Google ecosystem integrations for task-oriented software development.
Editor base
VS Code
Standalone
BYOK
Yes
No
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Windsurf | Google Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | Windsurf, now transitioning under the Devin Desktop brand, is an AI-native IDE for developers who want coding agents, codebase context, and editor workflows in one desktop environment. | Google Antigravity is an agent-first AI development platform that combines a desktop agent manager, IDE, CLI, SDK, and Google ecosystem integrations for task-oriented software development. |
| Type | AI IDEs / AI Code Editors | AI IDEs / AI Code Editors |
| Editor base | VS Code | Standalone |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $20 | $0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Local models | No | No |
| BYOK | Yes | No |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux, JetBrains plugin, VS Code plugin, Visual Studio plugin, Vim, Neovim, Jupyter, Chrome | macOS, Windows, Linux, Desktop app, Antigravity IDE, Antigravity CLI, Antigravity SDK, Google AI Studio, Firebase, Google Cloud, Android developer workflows |
| Models | SWE-1.6, SWE-1.6 Fast, SWE-1.5, SWE-1, SWE-1-mini, Claude 4 Sonnet, Claude 4 Sonnet Thinking, Claude 4 Opus, Claude 4 Opus Thinking, Claude, GPT, Gemini | Gemini 3.5 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3 Pro, Gemini 3 Flash, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, gpt-oss-120b |
| Enterprise features | Centralized billing, Admin dashboard, Analytics, SAML/OIDC SSO, Access control features, RBAC, Volume-based discounts, Priority or dedicated support, Dedicated account management, Dedicated deployment option, Hybrid deployment option, Model and provider access controls | Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform integration, Google Cloud project connection, Enterprise workload support through Google Cloud terms, Managed agent infrastructure via Gemini API, Persistent isolated environments through Managed Agents, Google Cloud and Firebase integrations, Project-level security settings, MCP integration for enterprise tools, SDK for custom agent behaviors, Scheduled background automation |
| Best for | Developers who want a VS Code-like AI IDE, Teams experimenting with local and cloud coding agents, Multi-file refactoring and codebase navigation, Full-stack app iteration with previews and terminal workflows, Engineers who want to move from chat-based coding into agent-managed tasks | Developers who want an agent-first IDE, Multi-agent coding workflows, Parallel background development tasks, Large feature implementation with review artifacts, UI changes that need screenshots or browser recordings, Firebase and Google Cloud projects, Android app prototyping, Google AI Studio to local development handoff, Teams exploring task-oriented agent orchestration, Developers who want Gemini-native coding agents |
| Not best for | Users who only need lightweight autocomplete, Teams that require a fully open-source editor stack, Strictly offline development environments, Developers who do not want an AI-first workflow inside their editor, Organizations that cannot send code context to external AI services without a reviewed enterprise agreement | Users who want a fully open-source coding agent, Developers who require local model execution, Teams that need provider-neutral BYOK model routing, Workflows where agents cannot access terminal, browser, or file tools, High-risk production repositories without backups and review gates, Developers who only need lightweight inline autocomplete |
Use Case Winners
Windsurf is built around a VS Code editor workflow.
Windsurf has BYOK or model-routing flexibility.
Google Antigravity has stronger frontend or web workflow signals.
Windsurf supports more model/provider options or BYOK-style workflows.
Pricing Comparison
Windsurf
- Free$0 / month
Free individual plan with access to the editor and included usage.
- Pro$20 / month
Individual paid plan with higher usage allowance and premium model access.
- Max$200 / month
High-usage individual plan for heavier agent workflows.
- Team$80 + $40/full user / month
Team plan with shared billing and full-seat access to Devin Desktop usage.
- EnterpriseContact sales
Enterprise plan with advanced security, admin, support, and deployment options.
Google Antigravity
- Individual$0 / month
Free individual access with baseline Gemini model quota, unlimited tab completions, unlimited command requests, and basic weekly rate limits.
- Google AI Pro$19.99 / month
Google AI plan with higher Antigravity quota than the free individual baseline, subject to Google AI plan limits.
- Google AI Ultra$100+ / month
Higher-usage Google AI tier with expanded Antigravity quota and access to third-party models where available.
- Gemini Enterprise / Google CloudCustom
Enterprise access through Google Cloud and Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform terms, with project-level integration and organization workflows.
Privacy & Security
Windsurf
Windsurf/Devin Desktop is covered by Cognition's privacy and security documentation. Teams should review data retention, telemetry, BYOK, model routing, and enterprise controls before using it with proprietary code, regulated data, secrets, or customer information.
Google Antigravity
Antigravity can process prompts, codebase context, file contents, terminal output, browser activity, tool calls, artifacts, and project metadata to operate its agents. Individual use is tied to Google account terms, while team and enterprise use may fall under Google Cloud or Gemini Enterprise terms. Users should configure sandbox mode, strict mode, file access policies, browser allowlists or denylists, project isolation, backups, and approval gates before allowing agents to run commands or modify important repositories.
Choose Windsurf if...
- Developers who want a VS Code-like AI IDE
- Teams experimenting with local and cloud coding agents
- Multi-file refactoring and codebase navigation
- Full-stack app iteration with previews and terminal workflows
- Engineers who want to move from chat-based coding into agent-managed tasks
Choose Google Antigravity if...
- Developers who want an agent-first IDE
- Multi-agent coding workflows
- Parallel background development tasks
- Large feature implementation with review artifacts
- UI changes that need screenshots or browser recordings
Avoid Windsurf if...
- Users who only need lightweight autocomplete
- Teams that require a fully open-source editor stack
- Strictly offline development environments
- Developers who do not want an AI-first workflow inside their editor
- Organizations that cannot send code context to external AI services without a reviewed enterprise agreement
Avoid Google Antigravity if...
- Users who want a fully open-source coding agent
- Developers who require local model execution
- Teams that need provider-neutral BYOK model routing
- Workflows where agents cannot access terminal, browser, or file tools
- High-risk production repositories without backups and review gates