ComparisonTerminal / CLI Coding Agents

Claude Code vs Amp

Compare Claude Code and Amp by workflow, pricing, privacy, model support, and best use cases.

Details checked Aug 29, 2026

Quick Verdict
Claude Code logo

Claude Code

Claude Code remains a leading terminal-native coding agent. The August 2026 cost and feedback tools make it more useful for teams operating Claude-based applications, not just editing repositories.

Amp logo

Amp

Amp is a strong fit for developers who want a terminal-first agent that can move between local work, remote execution, and multiple frontier models. It is less suitable for users who primarily want inline completion, a traditional IDE sidebar, local-only inference, or a currently available free plan.

Claude Code logo

Claude Code

Pricing model
Freemium
Free plan
No
Open source
No
Local models
No
BYOK
Yes
Editor base
CLI
Amp logo

Amp

Pricing model
Paid
Free plan
No
Open source
No
Local models
No
BYOK
Yes
Editor base
CLI

Key Differences

Workflow

Claude Code

Claude Code is Anthropic's terminal coding agent for repository work, subagents, hooks, MCP, and automation, with growing operational tooling for API cost analysis and feedback.

Amp

Amp is a terminal-first, multi-model coding agent focused on long-running local and remote software-engineering workflows.

Pricing

Claude Code

Freemium

Amp

Paid

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Code logoClaude CodeAmp logoAmp
Primary workflowClaude Code is Anthropic's terminal coding agent for repository work, subagents, hooks, MCP, and automation, with growing operational tooling for API cost analysis and feedback.Amp is a terminal-first, multi-model coding agent focused on long-running local and remote software-engineering workflows.
TypeTerminal / CLI Coding AgentsTerminal / CLI Coding Agents
Editor baseCLICLI
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starting price$20$20
Free planNoNo
Open sourceNoNo
Local modelsNoNo
BYOKYesYes
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, Windows, Terminal, VS Code, Cursor, VS Code forks, JetBrains IDEs, Claude desktop app, GitHub Actions, Claude Agent SDKmacOS, Linux, Windows via WSL, Web
ModelsClaude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5.6 Luna, Claude Fable 5, GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.7 Flash, GPT Image 2
Enterprise featuresTeam and Enterprise account administration, Central billing, Usage analytics, SSO support on organization plans, Admin controls, Enterprise deployment support, GitHub Actions integration, Claude Agent SDK access, Cloud provider deployment options, Security and compliance review through Anthropic enterprise channelsSSO, Directory Sync / SCIM, Enterprise managed settings, Workspace admin controls, Minimal data retention, Authentication audit logs, Application audit logs on request, SOC 2 Type II
Best forTerminal-first developers, Large refactors, Repository exploration, Debugging failing tests, Writing and updating tests, Code review preparation, Documentation automation, GitHub issue and PR workflows, Teams already using Claude, Developers who want a managed frontier-model coding agentDevelopers who prefer terminal-first agentic coding, Long-running refactors, migrations, debugging, and repository changes, Teams that want agents to keep working on remote machines, Users who want model routing rather than committing to one model provider
Not best forUsers who need local model execution, Developers who mainly want inline autocomplete, Non-technical users looking for a visual prompt-to-app builder, Teams requiring provider-agnostic model routing, Users who want a fully open-source coding agent, Projects where agentic shell actions are not allowed by security policyDevelopers mainly looking for inline autocomplete, Users who want a persistent VS Code sidebar extension, Local-only or offline model workflows, New users who require a currently open free tier

Use Case Winners

Best for teams and enterprise governance
Claude Code

Claude Code lists more team or enterprise controls.

Best for frontend or web app work
Amp

Amp has stronger frontend or web workflow signals.

Best for model flexibility
Amp

Amp supports more model/provider options or BYOK-style workflows.

Pricing Comparison

Claude Code logo

Claude Code

  • API Pay-as-you-goUsage-based

    Use Claude Code with a Claude Console account and pay standard Claude API token rates.

  • Claude Pro$20 / month

    $17/month when billed annually. Includes Claude Code with shared Claude plan usage limits.

  • Claude Max 5x$100 / month

    Higher individual usage tier with Claude Code included and about 5x Pro capacity per session.

  • Claude Max 20x$200 / month

    Highest individual usage tier with Claude Code included and about 20x Pro capacity per session.

  • Claude Team$25+ / user/month

    Team Standard starts at $25/user/month monthly or $20/user/month annually; Premium is available at higher usage and feature levels.

Amp logo

Amp

  • Megawatt$20 / month

    Includes $20 of agent usage, 750 hours of small Orbs, low/medium modes, and linked third-party subscription usage.

  • Gigawatt$200 / month

    Includes $200 of agent usage, 1,000 hours of xxlarge Orbs, and access to all modes including high and ultra.

  • UnconstrainedUsage-based

    Pay for model tokens and Orbs at standard rates; supports bring-your-own inference keys.

  • EnterpriseContact sales

    Adds SSO, directory sync, admin controls, minimal data retention, and support.

Privacy & Security

Claude Code logo

Claude Code

Claude Code may process prompts, codebase context, command output, files, tool calls, and repository metadata to provide coding assistance. Privacy and retention depend on whether the user authenticates through a Claude subscription, Anthropic API, or cloud provider deployment such as Bedrock, Vertex AI, or Foundry. Users should keep secrets out of prompts and source files, use environment variables or secret stores, and review permissions before allowing agentic actions.

Amp logo

Amp

Amp states that its server stores user and thread data, including partial code context, in US-based cloud infrastructure and sends partial code context to model providers for inference. It states that customer data is not used for training unless users explicitly opt in, while Enterprise workspaces can use stricter retention controls.

Choose Claude Code if...

  • Terminal-first developers
  • Large refactors
  • Repository exploration
  • Debugging failing tests
  • Writing and updating tests

Choose Amp if...

  • Developers who prefer terminal-first agentic coding
  • Long-running refactors, migrations, debugging, and repository changes
  • Teams that want agents to keep working on remote machines
  • Users who want model routing rather than committing to one model provider

Avoid Claude Code if...

  • Users who need local model execution
  • Developers who mainly want inline autocomplete
  • Non-technical users looking for a visual prompt-to-app builder
  • Teams requiring provider-agnostic model routing
  • Users who want a fully open-source coding agent

Avoid Amp if...

  • Developers mainly looking for inline autocomplete
  • Users who want a persistent VS Code sidebar extension
  • Local-only or offline model workflows
  • New users who require a currently open free tier