Windsurf vs Kiro Ide
从工作流、价格、隐私、模型支持和适用场景对比 Windsurf 和 Kiro Ide。
资料核对于 2026年6月23日
Windsurf
如果你想要一款 AI-first IDE，讓 agentic coding 貼近 editor、terminal 與 project context，Windsurf 值得選擇；如果你偏好較不強勢的工作流程，可以考慮輕量 extensions 或 CLI agents。
Kiro Ide
Choose Kiro when you want AI coding to start from structured specs and team standards rather than ad hoc chat prompts; choose Cursor, Windsurf, or Copilot when fast editor-native assistance is more important than a spec-first engineering process.
核心差异
工作流
Windsurf 目前正轉入 Devin Desktop 品牌，是一款 AI-native IDE，適合想在同一個桌面環境中使用 coding agents、codebase context 與 editor workflows 的開發者。
Kiro is an AWS-backed agentic AI IDE for spec-driven software development, combining local coding, CLI automation, web-based delegated agents, MCP tools, and team steering into one structured engineering workflow.
编辑器基础
VS Code
Standalone
BYOK
是
否
功能对比
| 维度 | Windsurf | Kiro Ide |
|---|---|---|
| 主要工作流 | Windsurf 目前正轉入 Devin Desktop 品牌，是一款 AI-native IDE，適合想在同一個桌面環境中使用 coding agents、codebase context 與 editor workflows 的開發者。 | Kiro is an AWS-backed agentic AI IDE for spec-driven software development, combining local coding, CLI automation, web-based delegated agents, MCP tools, and team steering into one structured engineering workflow. |
| 类型 | AI 代码编辑器 | AI 代码编辑器 |
| 编辑器基础 | VS Code | Standalone |
| 价格模式 | 免费增值 | 免费增值 |
| 起步价格 | $20 | $20 |
| 免费版 | 是 | 是 |
| 开源 | 否 | 否 |
| 本地模型 | 否 | 否 |
| BYOK | 是 | 否 |
| 平台 | macOS, Windows, Linux, JetBrains plugin, VS Code plugin, Visual Studio plugin, Vim, Neovim, Jupyter, Chrome | macOS, Windows, Linux, Web, CLI, GitHub, GitLab, AWS, MCP |
| 模型 | SWE-1.6, SWE-1.6 Fast, SWE-1.5, SWE-1, SWE-1-mini, Claude 4 Sonnet, Claude 4 Sonnet Thinking, Claude 4 Opus, Claude 4 Opus Thinking, Claude, GPT, Gemini | Auto, Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.0, Claude Haiku 4.5, DeepSeek 3.2, MiniMax M2.5, GLM-5, MiniMax M2.1, Qwen3 Coder Next |
| 企业能力 | 集中式 billing, Admin dashboard, Analytics, SAML/OIDC SSO, Access control features, RBAC, Volume-based discounts, Priority or dedicated support, Dedicated account management, Dedicated deployment option, Hybrid deployment option, Model and provider access controls | AWS IAM Identity Center integration, Okta and Microsoft Entra ID connection through IAM Identity Center, AWS account-based billing, Kiro console profiles, User and group subscriptions, Usage dashboard, Per-user activity reports, Prompt logging controls, CloudWatch metrics, AWS GovCloud support, Enterprise data collection opt-out, Admin-managed settings, Supported Kiro console regions including US East, Europe Frankfurt, and AWS GovCloud regions |
| 适合场景 | 想要 VS Code-like AI IDE 的開發者, 正在嘗試 local 與 cloud coding agents 的團隊, 多檔案重構與 codebase navigation, 搭配 previews 與 terminal workflows 進行 full-stack app iteration, 想從 chat-based coding 轉向 agent-managed tasks 的工程師 | Teams that want AI coding with requirements, design docs, and implementation plans, Developers moving prototypes toward production-quality code, Large codebases where persistent project context and team standards matter, AWS-oriented teams that want enterprise identity, billing, and governance, Workflows that benefit from MCP tools, hooks, and repeatable agent automation, Developers who want both a desktop AI IDE and a CLI agent |
| 不适合场景 | 只需要輕量 autocomplete 的使用者, 需要完全 open-source editor stack 的團隊, 嚴格離線的開發環境, 不想在編輯器中使用 AI-first workflow 的開發者, 沒有經過審查的 enterprise agreement，就不能將 code context 傳送到外部 AI services 的組織 | Users who only want lightweight autocomplete inside an existing editor, Teams that require fully local model execution, Developers who want open-source IDE source code, Small one-off edits where a simpler chat-based editor may be faster, Organizations that cannot accept hosted AI processing or credit-based usage billing |
场景胜出
Windsurf 围绕 VS Code 编辑器工作流构建。
Windsurf 具备 BYOK 或模型路由灵活性。
Kiro Ide 列出了更多团队或企业控制能力。
Kiro Ide 的前端或 Web 工作流信号更强。
价格对比
Windsurf
- Free$0 / month
免費個人方案，提供編輯器存取與內含使用量。
- Pro$20 / month
個人付費方案，提供更高使用額度與 premium model access。
- Max$200 / month
高用量個人方案，適合更重度的 agent workflows。
- Team$80 + $40/full user / month
團隊方案，提供 shared billing 與 Devin Desktop usage 的 full-seat access。
- Enterprise聯絡銷售
企業方案，提供進階安全、管理、支援與部署選項。
Kiro Ide
- Free$0 / per month
Perpetual free tier with 50 monthly credits and limited access to open-weight models and selected Claude models.
- Pro$20 / per month
Includes 1,000 monthly credits and access to paid-tier model capacity with optional overages.
- Pro+$40 / per month
Includes 2,000 monthly credits for more frequent agentic development sessions.
- Pro Max$100 / per month
Includes 5,000 monthly credits and the full Kiro feature set, including specs, custom subagents, powers, hooks, and full CLI access.
- Power$200 / per month
Includes 10,000 monthly credits for heavy individual or team usage.
隐私与安全
Windsurf
Windsurf/Devin Desktop 適用 Cognition 的隱私與安全文件。團隊在將其用於 proprietary code、regulated data、secrets 或 customer information 前，應審查 data retention、telemetry、BYOK、model routing 與 enterprise controls。
Kiro Ide
Kiro is an AWS application. Its IDE privacy documentation describes AWS shared-responsibility security practices, while Kiro Web documentation states that task descriptions, chat messages, code changes, and additional context may be stored to execute tasks. Kiro Web documentation also states that content from Free Tier and individual subscribers may be used for service improvement unless opted out, while enterprise users are automatically opted out of telemetry and content collection by AWS. Teams should review Kiro Web sandbox access, connected GitHub/GitLab permissions, MCP tools, secrets, network access, and enterprise logging settings before using it with sensitive code.
适合选择 Windsurf 的情况
- 想要 VS Code-like AI IDE 的開發者
- 正在嘗試 local 與 cloud coding agents 的團隊
- 多檔案重構與 codebase navigation
- 搭配 previews 與 terminal workflows 進行 full-stack app iteration
- 想從 chat-based coding 轉向 agent-managed tasks 的工程師
适合选择 Kiro Ide 的情况
- Teams that want AI coding with requirements, design docs, and implementation plans
- Developers moving prototypes toward production-quality code
- Large codebases where persistent project context and team standards matter
- AWS-oriented teams that want enterprise identity, billing, and governance
- Workflows that benefit from MCP tools, hooks, and repeatable agent automation
不适合选择 Windsurf 的情况
- 只需要輕量 autocomplete 的使用者
- 需要完全 open-source editor stack 的團隊
- 嚴格離線的開發環境
- 不想在編輯器中使用 AI-first workflow 的開發者
- 沒有經過審查的 enterprise agreement，就不能將 code context 傳送到外部 AI services 的組織
不适合选择 Kiro Ide 的情况
- Users who only want lightweight autocomplete inside an existing editor
- Teams that require fully local model execution
- Developers who want open-source IDE source code
- Small one-off edits where a simpler chat-based editor may be faster
- Organizations that cannot accept hosted AI processing or credit-based usage billing