Cline vs Kilo Code
Cline と Kilo Code をワークフロー、価格、プライバシー、モデル対応、用途で比較します。
情報確認日 2026年6月16日
Cline
Choose Cline when you want an open-source, human-approved coding agent inside your existing editor and terminal with strong model flexibility and MCP extensibility. Choose a hosted AI IDE if you want predictable bundled pricing and a polished all-in-one editor, or a CLI agent if you prefer terminal-only Git workflows.
Kilo Code
Choose Kilo Code when openness, model flexibility, BYOK/local options, and cross-surface agent workflows matter more than having one tightly controlled first-party editor experience.
主な違い
ワークフロー
Cline is an open-source, model-flexible AI coding agent for developers who want agentic file editing, command execution, browser use, MCP tools, and human-in-the-loop control inside existing development environments.
Kilo Code positions itself as an open-source, multi-model coding agent that spans IDE extensions, CLI, cloud agents, and team governance.
機能比較
| 項目 | Cline | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| 主なワークフロー | Cline is an open-source, model-flexible AI coding agent for developers who want agentic file editing, command execution, browser use, MCP tools, and human-in-the-loop control inside existing development environments. | Kilo Code positions itself as an open-source, multi-model coding agent that spans IDE extensions, CLI, cloud agents, and team governance. |
| タイプ | AI コーディング拡張 | AI コーディング拡張 |
| エディタ基盤 | VS Code | VS Code |
| 価格モデル | オープンソース | オープンソース |
| 開始価格 | $0 | $0 |
| 無料プラン | はい | はい |
| オープンソース | はい | はい |
| ローカルモデル | はい | はい |
| BYOK | はい | はい |
| 対応プラットフォーム | VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains IDEs, CLI, macOS, Windows, Linux, Antigravity, Zed, Neovim via ACP mode, Cline SDK, Kanban | VS Code, Open VSX-compatible editors, JetBrains IDEs, CLI, Cloud Agents, Slack |
| モデル | Cline Provider, Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex, Groq, Cerebras, Vercel AI Gateway, DeepSeek, Local models, OpenAI-compatible providers | Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini, xAI Grok, MiniMax, Z.ai GLM, DeepSeek, Mistral AI, Moonshot AI Kimi, AWS Bedrock, Ollama, LM Studio, Atomic Chat, OpenRouter, OpenAI-compatible providers |
| エンタープライズ機能 | JetBrains extension, SSO, SLA, Dedicated support, Centralized billing, Simple configuration management, Role-based access control, Limit inference providers, Team management dashboard, Authentication logs, Advanced configuration management, Fine-grained permissioning, OpenTelemetry, Datadog integration, Grafana integration, Splunk integration, API access for enterprise features | Centralized billing, Usage analytics and reporting, AI adoption score, Shared agent modes, Shared BYOK, Team management, Data privacy controls, Model and provider restrictions, Shared Private Gateway BYOK, Audit logs, SSO, OIDC, and SCIM, SLA commitments, Dedicated support channels |
| 向いている用途 | VS Code users who want an open-source coding agent, Developers who want BYOK model control, Teams experimenting with MCP tools, Multi-file refactoring, Test-driven bug fixing, Browser-assisted UI debugging, Terminal-driven development, Local and self-hosted model experiments, Developers who want a human-approved agent instead of fully autonomous changes, Teams building custom workflows on an agent SDK | Developers who want an open-source AI coding agent inside VS Code or JetBrains., Teams that want BYOK, shared modes, usage analytics, and centralized AI cost controls., Power users who switch between IDE and terminal workflows., Developers comparing Roo Code, Cline, Continue, Cursor, and Claude Code., Privacy-conscious workflows that can run capable local models. |
| 向いていない用途 | Users who want a simple fixed-price AI IDE subscription, Developers whose main need is inline autocomplete, Non-technical users looking for prompt-to-app web builders, Teams that cannot allow AI tools to run terminal commands, Organizations that need turnkey enterprise controls without custom setup, Users who do not want to manage API keys, inference credits, provider choice, or local models | Users who only need lightweight autocomplete with minimal setup., Non-technical users looking for a no-code prompt-to-app builder., Teams that require a single fixed first-party model vendor., Developers without budget or hardware for higher-capability model usage. |
用途別の向き不向き
Cline lists more team or enterprise controls.
Cline has stronger frontend or web workflow signals.
Kilo Code supports more model/provider options or BYOK-style workflows.
価格比較
Cline
- Open Source$0
Free for individual developers. Use the open-source extension, CLI, and supported local workflows; pay only for model inference.
- Cline ProviderUsage-based
Unified billing through Cline with credits and supported hosted models, including free model options where available.
- Bring Your Own KeyUsage-based
Use your own API keys from providers such as Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter, AWS Bedrock, Vertex AI, Groq, Cerebras, Vercel AI Gateway, DeepSeek, and others.
- Local Models$0
Run local or self-hosted models where supported; actual cost depends on local hardware and chosen model.
- EnterpriseCustom
Adds JetBrains support, SSO, SLA, dedicated support, centralized billing, RBAC, team management, provider controls, authentication logs, and advanced configuration options.
Kilo Code
- Free & Open Source$0 / forever
Core VS Code, JetBrains, and CLI coding agent; AI usage is billed separately or supplied via BYOK/local models.
- Teams$15/user / month
Adds centralized billing, usage analytics, shared modes, shared BYOK, team management, privacy controls, and priority support.
- EnterpriseCustom
Adds model/provider restrictions, private gateway BYOK, audit logs, SSO/OIDC/SCIM, SLA commitments, and dedicated support.
- Auto Free / BYOK / Local$0 / month
Use free routed models where available, bring provider keys, or run local models with Ollama, LM Studio, or Atomic Chat.
- Kilo Gateway$0 + usage / month
Pay-as-you-go hosted inference at provider rates with no AI inference markup.
プライバシーとセキュリティ
Cline
Cline runs client-side in the user’s development environment, but prompts, code context, terminal output, browser data, and tool results may be sent to the selected model provider or Cline Provider depending on configuration. Cline’s terms say telemetry data may include non-code metadata and is enabled by default but can be disabled in extension settings. BYOK privacy depends on the selected third-party provider, so users should avoid exposing secrets, customer data, private keys, production credentials, or regulated data through prompts, terminal output, browser sessions, MCP tools, or local files included in context.
Kilo Code
Kilo Code can use local models through Ollama, LM Studio, and Atomic Chat for workflows where code and prompts stay on the local machine. Hosted Gateway, Cloud Agents, code review, and BYOK routing may send prompts, repository context, or outputs to Kilo infrastructure and/or the selected model provider, so sensitive repositories should be reviewed against provider terms, enterprise controls, and internal policy.
Cline が向いている場合
- VS Code users who want an open-source coding agent
- Developers who want BYOK model control
- Teams experimenting with MCP tools
- Multi-file refactoring
- Test-driven bug fixing
Kilo Code が向いている場合
- Developers who want an open-source AI coding agent inside VS Code or JetBrains.
- Teams that want BYOK, shared modes, usage analytics, and centralized AI cost controls.
- Power users who switch between IDE and terminal workflows.
- Developers comparing Roo Code, Cline, Continue, Cursor, and Claude Code.
- Privacy-conscious workflows that can run capable local models.
Cline を避けるべき場合
- Users who want a simple fixed-price AI IDE subscription
- Developers whose main need is inline autocomplete
- Non-technical users looking for prompt-to-app web builders
- Teams that cannot allow AI tools to run terminal commands
- Organizations that need turnkey enterprise controls without custom setup
Kilo Code を避けるべき場合
- Users who only need lightweight autocomplete with minimal setup.
- Non-technical users looking for a no-code prompt-to-app builder.
- Teams that require a single fixed first-party model vendor.
- Developers without budget or hardware for higher-capability model usage.