比較CLI コーディングエージェント

Claude Code vs OpenCode

Claude Code と OpenCode をワークフロー、価格、プライバシー、モデル対応、用途で比較します。

情報確認日 2026年8月29日

要点
Claude Code logo

Claude Code

Claude Code remains a leading terminal-native coding agent. The August 2026 cost and feedback tools make it more useful for teams operating Claude-based applications, not just editing repositories.

OpenCode logo

OpenCode

OpenCode remains one of the strongest open and provider-flexible coding harnesses. OpenCode Go adds a simple $10 managed-model option without removing BYOK or turning the harness into a closed service.

Claude Code logo

Claude Code

価格モデル
フリーミアム
無料プラン
いいえ
オープンソース
いいえ
ローカルモデル
いいえ
BYOK
はい
エディタ基盤
CLI
OpenCode logo

OpenCode

価格モデル
オープンソース
無料プラン
はい
オープンソース
はい
ローカルモデル
はい
BYOK
はい
エディタ基盤
CLI

主な違い

ワークフロー

Claude Code

Claude Code is Anthropic's terminal coding agent for repository work, subagents, hooks, MCP, and automation, with growing operational tooling for API cost analysis and feedback.

OpenCode

OpenCode is an open-source coding-agent harness for terminal, desktop, and IDE workflows with broad provider support, BYOK, and an optional OpenCode Go subscription for curated open models.

価格

Claude Code

フリーミアム

OpenCode

オープンソース

ローカルモデル

Claude Code

いいえ

OpenCode

はい

オープンソース

Claude Code

いいえ

OpenCode

はい

機能比較

項目Claude Code logoClaude CodeOpenCode logoOpenCode
主なワークフローClaude Code is Anthropic's terminal coding agent for repository work, subagents, hooks, MCP, and automation, with growing operational tooling for API cost analysis and feedback.OpenCode is an open-source coding-agent harness for terminal, desktop, and IDE workflows with broad provider support, BYOK, and an optional OpenCode Go subscription for curated open models.
タイプCLI コーディングエージェントCLI コーディングエージェント
エディタ基盤CLICLI
価格モデルフリーミアムオープンソース
開始価格$20$0
無料プランいいえはい
オープンソースいいえはい
ローカルモデルいいえはい
BYOKはいはい
対応プラットフォームmacOS, Linux, Windows, Terminal, VS Code, Cursor, VS Code forks, JetBrains IDEs, Claude desktop app, GitHub Actions, Claude Agent SDKmacOS, Linux, Windows, WSL, Terminal, Desktop app, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VSCodium, ACP-compatible editors, GitHub Actions
モデルClaude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5Claude, GPT, Gemini, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Plus, ChatGPT Pro, GLM-5.1, GLM-5, Kimi K2.7 Code, Kimi K2.6, MiMo-V2.5, MiMo-V2.5-Pro, MiniMax M3, MiniMax M2.7, Qwen3.7 Max, Qwen3.7 Plus, Qwen3.6 Plus, DeepSeek V4 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Local models
エンタープライズ機能Team and Enterprise account administration, Central billing, Usage analytics, SSO support on organization plans, Admin controls, Enterprise deployment support, GitHub Actions integration, Claude Agent SDK access, Cloud provider deployment options, Security and compliance review through Anthropic enterprise channelsCentralized organization config, SSO integration, Internal AI gateway routing, Ability to disable other AI providers, Per-seat enterprise pricing, No token charge from OpenCode when using an internal LLM gateway, Share feature can be disabled, Private npm registry support through .npmrc, Implementation support, Roadmap support for self-hosted share pages
向いている用途Terminal-first developers, Large refactors, Repository exploration, Debugging failing tests, Writing and updating tests, Code review preparation, Documentation automation, GitHub issue and PR workflows, Teams already using Claude, Developers who want a managed frontier-model coding agentTerminal-first developers, Open-source AI coding workflows, Claude Code alternatives, BYOK model routing, Local model experiments, Developers who want to switch between multiple LLM providers, GitHub issue and pull request automation, Teams that want internal AI gateway control, Developers using VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, or VSCodium with terminal-based agents, Cost-sensitive users who want optional open-model subscriptions
向いていない用途Users who need local model execution, Developers who mainly want inline autocomplete, Non-technical users looking for a visual prompt-to-app builder, Teams requiring provider-agnostic model routing, Users who want a fully open-source coding agent, Projects where agentic shell actions are not allowed by security policyUsers who want a fully managed proprietary AI IDE with minimal setup, Non-developers building apps from prompts, Developers whose main need is inline autocomplete, Teams that require polished enterprise admin dashboards out of the box, Users who do not want to manage provider credentials, model selection, or usage limits, Highly sensitive projects using public share links or unapproved external providers

用途別の向き不向き

プライベート/制御されたモデル運用に最適
OpenCode

OpenCode supports local model workflows.

モデル柔軟性に最適
OpenCode

OpenCode supports more model/provider options or BYOK-style workflows.

オープンソース重視に最適
OpenCode

OpenCode is marked as open source.

価格比較

Claude Code logo

Claude Code

  • API Pay-as-you-goUsage-based

    Use Claude Code with a Claude Console account and pay standard Claude API token rates.

  • Claude Pro$20 / month

    $17/month when billed annually. Includes Claude Code with shared Claude plan usage limits.

  • Claude Max 5x$100 / month

    Higher individual usage tier with Claude Code included and about 5x Pro capacity per session.

  • Claude Max 20x$200 / month

    Highest individual usage tier with Claude Code included and about 20x Pro capacity per session.

  • Claude Team$25+ / user/month

    Team Standard starts at $25/user/month monthly or $20/user/month annually; Premium is available at higher usage and feature levels.

OpenCode logo

OpenCode

  • Open Source$0

    MIT-licensed open-source coding agent. Users can install and run OpenCode locally with their own model credentials.

  • Bring Your Own ModelUsage-based

    Use external LLM providers through API keys, GitHub Copilot login, ChatGPT Plus/Pro login, local models, or OpenAI-compatible endpoints.

  • OpenCode ZenPay-as-you-go

    Optional curated model gateway with per-token pricing and usage limits for teams or individuals.

  • OpenCode Go$10 / month

    Optional provider with stable access to a curated set of open coding models; BYOK remains available.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Per-seat enterprise plan with centralized config, SSO integration, internal AI gateway routing, and implementation support.

プライバシーとセキュリティ

Claude Code logo

Claude Code

Claude Code may process prompts, codebase context, command output, files, tool calls, and repository metadata to provide coding assistance. Privacy and retention depend on whether the user authenticates through a Claude subscription, Anthropic API, or cloud provider deployment such as Bedrock, Vertex AI, or Foundry. Users should keep secrets out of prompts and source files, use environment variables or secret stores, and review permissions before allowing agentic actions.

OpenCode logo

OpenCode

OpenCode states that it does not store code or context data by default, with processing happening locally or through direct API calls to the selected AI provider. The main exception is the optional /share feature, which uploads conversation data to OpenCode-hosted share pages and creates public links. Privacy depends on provider choice, local model usage, enterprise gateway routing, share settings, and whether sensitive files, secrets, or production data are included in context.

Claude Code が向いている場合

  • Terminal-first developers
  • Large refactors
  • Repository exploration
  • Debugging failing tests
  • Writing and updating tests

OpenCode が向いている場合

  • Terminal-first developers
  • Open-source AI coding workflows
  • Claude Code alternatives
  • BYOK model routing
  • Local model experiments

Claude Code を避けるべき場合

  • Users who need local model execution
  • Developers who mainly want inline autocomplete
  • Non-technical users looking for a visual prompt-to-app builder
  • Teams requiring provider-agnostic model routing
  • Users who want a fully open-source coding agent

OpenCode を避けるべき場合

  • Users who want a fully managed proprietary AI IDE with minimal setup
  • Non-developers building apps from prompts
  • Developers whose main need is inline autocomplete
  • Teams that require polished enterprise admin dashboards out of the box
  • Users who do not want to manage provider credentials, model selection, or usage limits