Roo Code vs Sourcegraph Cody
Compare Roo Code and Sourcegraph Cody by workflow, pricing, privacy, model support, and best use cases.
Roo Code
Choose Roo Code when you want a powerful, open-source VS Code agent with modes, MCP, provider flexibility, local-model options, and deep customization. Choose a hosted AI IDE or CLI agent instead if you want simpler billing, a more polished all-in-one editor, or a terminal-only Git workflow.
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody is strongest when paired with Sourcegraph Enterprise and large-scale code search. It is less suitable as a personal AI coding tool now that Cody Free and Cody Pro have been discontinued.
Key Differences
Workflow
Roo Code is a powerful open-source VS Code coding agent for developers who want model choice, deep customization, local control, and multi-step agentic workflows inside their editor.
Sourcegraph Cody is an enterprise AI coding assistant focused on codebase-aware chat, code edits, completions, and context retrieval across large multi-repository environments.
Pricing
open-source
enterprise
compare.fields.localModels
Yes
No
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Roo Code | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | Roo Code is a powerful open-source VS Code coding agent for developers who want model choice, deep customization, local control, and multi-step agentic workflows inside their editor. | Sourcegraph Cody is an enterprise AI coding assistant focused on codebase-aware chat, code edits, completions, and context retrieval across large multi-repository environments. |
| Type | extension | extension |
| Editor base | VS Code | VS Code |
| Pricing model | open-source | enterprise |
| Starting price | $0 | $16000 |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Local models | Yes | No |
| BYOK | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms | VS Code, VS Code-compatible editors, macOS, Windows, Linux, Local development environments, Roomote cloud agent workflows | VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, Sourcegraph Web, Cody CLI, GitHub, GitLab, Sourcegraph Cloud, Sourcegraph self-hosted |
| Models | Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter, Requesty, Google Gemini, Google Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, MiniMax, Cerebras, Moonshot AI, Chutes AI, Ollama, LM Studio, OpenAI-compatible providers | Claude Opus 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro, GPT-5.1, OpenAI 4.1, OpenAI 4.1-mini, OpenAI 4.1-nano, OpenAI o3, OpenAI o4-mini, Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview, Google Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Amazon Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Google Cloud Vertex AI |
| Enterprise features | Open-source self-managed usage, Custom modes for team roles, .roorules project guidance, Skills for reusable workflows, MCP integrations, Local model option, BYOK provider control, Semantic codebase indexing, Roomote cloud-agent workflow for Slack, GitHub, logs, tickets, and PR handoff | Sourcegraph Enterprise support, Single-tenant cloud, Self-hosted deployment, Enterprise admin and security controls, SSO and RBAC through Sourcegraph platform, Context Filters, Cody Gateway, Enterprise model selection, Org-wide AI credit pooling, Sourcegraph Code Search integration, MCP Server access, GraphQL and REST APIs, CLI access, 24x5 support with upgrade options |
| Best for | VS Code users who want an open-source AI coding agent, Developers who want provider choice and BYOK control, Multi-file refactoring, Debugging and test repair, Architecture planning with dedicated modes, Custom workflow automation, MCP-connected development tasks, Local model experiments, Large codebases that benefit from semantic indexing, Teams that want project-specific rules and custom agent personas | Enterprise teams with large monorepos or multi-repository architectures, Organizations already using Sourcegraph Code Search and code intelligence, Developers who need AI answers grounded in remote repository context, Security-conscious teams that need context filtering and enterprise controls, Teams that want AI assistance inside existing IDEs rather than switching editors |
| Not best for | Users who want a fully managed fixed-price AI IDE, Developers whose main need is inline autocomplete, Non-technical users looking for prompt-to-app builders, Teams that cannot allow agentic tools to run terminal commands, Users who do not want to manage API keys or provider billing, Workflows that require enterprise governance out of the box without custom setup | Individual developers looking for a low-cost personal AI coding assistant, Teams that want a standalone AI-native editor, Users looking for a fully autonomous coding agent that takes issues end-to-end, Organizations that do not plan to deploy or buy Sourcegraph Enterprise, Developers who need local model execution as a primary feature |
Use Case Winners
Both Roo Code and Sourcegraph Cody have comparable signals here.
Roo Code supports local model workflows.
Sourcegraph Cody lists more team or enterprise controls.
Both Roo Code and Sourcegraph Cody have comparable signals here.
Both Roo Code and Sourcegraph Cody have comparable signals here.
Both Roo Code and Sourcegraph Cody have comparable signals here.
Pricing Comparison
Roo Code
- Roo Code Extension$0
Free and open-source VS Code extension. Users pay only for the model provider or infrastructure they choose.
- Bring Your Own API KeyUsage-based
Use external inference providers such as Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter, Requesty, Google, and others; costs depend on provider token pricing.
- Local Models$0
Use local models through supported setups such as Ollama or LM Studio; actual cost depends on local hardware.
- Codebase IndexingUsage-based
Optional semantic indexing may require embedding API usage and a Qdrant vector database; cost depends on repository size.
- Roomote Cloud Agent$899 / month
Cloud agent product made by the creators of Roo Code; priced per parallel Roomote after a 7-day trial with included token allowance.
Sourcegraph Cody
- Sourcegraph EnterpriseFrom $16K
Enterprise platform plan that includes credits for AI features and scales with team size.
- Cody EnterpriseContact sales
Enterprise-supported Cody access for Sourcegraph customers; Cody Free, Cody Pro, and Enterprise Starter Cody access were discontinued in 2025.
- Volume AI CreditsCustom
Additional volume credit buckets are available as add-ons for AI feature usage.
Privacy & Security
Roo Code
Roo Code runs locally inside the developer’s VS Code environment, but prompts, file context, terminal output, MCP tool results, embeddings, and generated edits may be sent to whichever model or embedding provider the user configures. Local-model setups reduce external data exposure, while BYOK setups inherit the privacy and retention terms of the selected provider. Users should avoid exposing secrets, credentials, production data, customer data, private keys, or sensitive terminal output, and should be especially cautious with auto-approval, web browsing, MCP servers, and untrusted repositories.
Sourcegraph Cody
Cody collects prompts and responses to provide the service, and Sourcegraph documentation says it does not use user data to train models. Sourcegraph AI Terms state that Sourcegraph and partner LLMs do not use customer code to train models, and partner LLMs use zero-retention handling for inputs, outputs, and candidate context when accessed through Sourcegraph Partner LLMs. Enterprise teams should review AI Terms, Context Filters, Cody Gateway, model routing, self-hosting, and codehost permissions before rollout.
Choose Roo Code if...
- VS Code users who want an open-source AI coding agent
- Developers who want provider choice and BYOK control
- Multi-file refactoring
- Debugging and test repair
- Architecture planning with dedicated modes
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if...
- Enterprise teams with large monorepos or multi-repository architectures
- Organizations already using Sourcegraph Code Search and code intelligence
- Developers who need AI answers grounded in remote repository context
- Security-conscious teams that need context filtering and enterprise controls
- Teams that want AI assistance inside existing IDEs rather than switching editors
Avoid Roo Code if...
- Users who want a fully managed fixed-price AI IDE
- Developers whose main need is inline autocomplete
- Non-technical users looking for prompt-to-app builders
- Teams that cannot allow agentic tools to run terminal commands
- Users who do not want to manage API keys or provider billing
Avoid Sourcegraph Cody if...
- Individual developers looking for a low-cost personal AI coding assistant
- Teams that want a standalone AI-native editor
- Users looking for a fully autonomous coding agent that takes issues end-to-end
- Organizations that do not plan to deploy or buy Sourcegraph Enterprise
- Developers who need local model execution as a primary feature