Codeanywhere vs Eclipse Che
Compare Codeanywhere and Eclipse Che by workflow, pricing, privacy, model support, and best use cases.
Codeanywhere
Codeanywhere is still worth documenting for legacy users and historical cloud IDE comparisons, but its official sunset notice makes it risky for new long-term adoption. Existing users should export projects and evaluate GitHub Codespaces, Coder, Gitpod/Ona, CodeSandbox, StackBlitz, or Replit based on whether they need GitHub-native dev containers, self-hosted governance, browser sandboxes, or all-in-one app building.
Eclipse Che
Eclipse Che is a strong choice for organizations that want open-source, Kubernetes-native, browser-based developer workspaces with enterprise control. It is less suitable for teams that want a fully managed SaaS IDE, built-in AI coding, or a low-operations setup.
Key Differences
Workflow
Codeanywhere is a legacy AI cloud IDE for browser-based VS Code workspaces, remote containers, Git development, terminal access, collaboration, and cloud development from any device.
Eclipse Che is an open-source Kubernetes-native cloud development environment platform for teams that want centrally managed, browser-based, reproducible developer workspaces.
Pricing
freemium
open-source
compare.fields.openSource
No
Yes
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Codeanywhere | Eclipse Che |
|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | Codeanywhere is a legacy AI cloud IDE for browser-based VS Code workspaces, remote containers, Git development, terminal access, collaboration, and cloud development from any device. | Eclipse Che is an open-source Kubernetes-native cloud development environment platform for teams that want centrally managed, browser-based, reproducible developer workspaces. |
| Type | resource | framework |
| Editor base | Browser | Browser |
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Local models | No | No |
| BYOK | No | No |
| Platforms | Web browser, VS Code browser IDE, Cloud workspaces, Containers, Dev containers, Dockerfile-based environments, Terminal, SSH, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Linux, macOS, Windows, Chromebook, On-premises or own-cloud enterprise deployment | Browser, Kubernetes, OpenShift, AWS EKS, Azure AKS, Google Kubernetes Engine, Minikube, vCluster, Visual Studio Code - Open Source, JetBrains IDEs, Open VSX |
| Models | Unknown | Unknown |
| Enterprise features | Enterprise program, Run on-premises, Run in your own cloud, Custom plans, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance, Workspace sharing, Team members, Remote workspaces, Port forwarding, Terminal SSH, CLI for Linux, Mac, and Windows, Dockerfile support, Dev Container support, Environment variables, Remote server connections, Custom security and compliance discussions | Kubernetes and OpenShift deployment, OIDC authentication, OpenShift OAuth and Dex integration, Kubernetes RBAC authorization, Multi-user workspace management, Restricted and air-gapped installation support, Standalone Open VSX registry support, CheCluster custom resource configuration, Prometheus and Grafana monitoring integration, Workspace isolation through Kubernetes namespaces and pods |
| Best for | Legacy Codeanywhere users, Short-term cloud IDE workflows before sunset, Browser-based VS Code development, Developer onboarding, Education and bootcamps, Freelancers working across devices, Remote workspaces from Git repositories, GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket projects, Container-based web development, Quick terminal and SSH access from a browser, Teams comparing historical cloud IDE products | Enterprise teams standardizing development environments on Kubernetes or OpenShift, Organizations replacing local workstation setup with centralized browser-based workspaces, Platform engineering teams building cloud development environments, Teams that want devfile-based, version-controlled workspace definitions, Projects that benefit from production-like development runtimes inside Kubernetes pods |
| Not best for | New long-term cloud IDE adoption after the announced sunset, Teams needing a future-proof CDE roadmap, Users looking for autonomous coding agents, Non-technical prompt-to-app builders, Teams needing deep self-hosted CDE governance comparable to Coder, Developers needing GitHub-native dev containers comparable to Codespaces, AI agent runtime or sandbox infrastructure use cases | Small teams that want a simple managed IDE with no Kubernetes operations, Developers looking for an AI coding assistant or prompt-to-app builder, Teams that do not use containers, Kubernetes, OpenShift, or devfile workflows, Organizations without capacity to manage storage, networking, OIDC, RBAC, upgrades, and cluster sizing, Solo developers who mainly need lightweight local development |
Use Case Winners
Both Codeanywhere and Eclipse Che have comparable signals here.
Both Codeanywhere and Eclipse Che have comparable signals here.
Codeanywhere lists more team or enterprise controls.
Codeanywhere has stronger frontend or web workflow signals.
Neither tool shows a strong signal for this use case in the current structured data.
Eclipse Che is marked as open source.
Pricing Comparison
Codeanywhere
- Free$0
One-time free usage with 4 vCPU, 8 GB memory, 100 GB storage, 500K AI tokens, 20 hours, 1 parallel workspace, and 15-minute inactivity timeout.
- Basic$9.60 / member/month
Annual billing. Includes 4 vCPU, 8 GB memory, 100 GB storage, 1M AI tokens, 150 hours, 3 parallel workspaces, 5 pinned workspaces, and 60-minute inactivity timeout.
- Premium$23 / member/month
Annual billing. Includes up to 8 vCPU, 16 GB memory, 100 GB storage, 1M AI tokens, up to 300 hours, 6 parallel workspaces, and 5 pinned workspaces.
- EnterpriseCustom
Run Codeanywhere on-premises or in your own cloud with added security, compliance, custom plans, and organization-focused support.
- Add-onsUsage-based
Documentation lists add-on packages such as +40 computer hours and +100,000 AI/API tokens.
Eclipse Che
- Open Source$0 / month
Eclipse Che is free and open source under the Eclipse Public License 2.0.
- Self-Hosted InfrastructureUsage-based
You provide and pay for Kubernetes, OpenShift, storage, networking, identity, and compute resources.
- Hosted Trial / Samples$0
Public sample workspaces may be available through Red Hat-hosted OpenShift workspaces, subject to availability and account requirements.
Privacy & Security
Codeanywhere
Codeanywhere workspaces can contain repository code, terminal history, SSH connections, environment variables, workspace files, AI assistant context, and collaboration activity. The official site states SSL/TLS encryption, strict access controls, authentication mechanisms, backups, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and GDPR compliance. Because the service is sunsetting, users should export important code, review secrets, remove unused remote connections, and migrate workspaces before relying on it for ongoing development.
Eclipse Che
Eclipse Che is typically self-hosted on infrastructure controlled by the organization. Source code, workspace containers, credentials, logs, and runtime data are governed by the chosen Kubernetes or OpenShift cluster, storage backend, identity provider, RBAC policies, and extension registry configuration. Teams should review cluster access, namespace isolation, secrets handling, image provenance, Open VSX registry policy, and log retention before rollout.
Choose Codeanywhere if...
- Legacy Codeanywhere users
- Short-term cloud IDE workflows before sunset
- Browser-based VS Code development
- Developer onboarding
- Education and bootcamps
Choose Eclipse Che if...
- Enterprise teams standardizing development environments on Kubernetes or OpenShift
- Organizations replacing local workstation setup with centralized browser-based workspaces
- Platform engineering teams building cloud development environments
- Teams that want devfile-based, version-controlled workspace definitions
- Projects that benefit from production-like development runtimes inside Kubernetes pods
Avoid Codeanywhere if...
- New long-term cloud IDE adoption after the announced sunset
- Teams needing a future-proof CDE roadmap
- Users looking for autonomous coding agents
- Non-technical prompt-to-app builders
- Teams needing deep self-hosted CDE governance comparable to Coder
Avoid Eclipse Che if...
- Small teams that want a simple managed IDE with no Kubernetes operations
- Developers looking for an AI coding assistant or prompt-to-app builder
- Teams that do not use containers, Kubernetes, OpenShift, or devfile workflows
- Organizations without capacity to manage storage, networking, OIDC, RBAC, upgrades, and cluster sizing
- Solo developers who mainly need lightweight local development