Augment Code vs JetBrains AI
Compare Augment Code and JetBrains AI by workflow, pricing, privacy, model support, and best use cases.
Augment Code
Choose Augment Code when the main problem is applying AI to large, real-world codebases without forcing developers to abandon their current IDEs. It is less attractive as a cheap personal autocomplete tool, but strong for teams that value deep context, cloud agents, code review, automation, and enterprise controls.
JetBrains AI
JetBrains AI is a strong choice for developers and teams already committed to JetBrains IDEs who want AI assistance without leaving their existing language-specific workflow. It is less suitable for teams that want a standalone AI editor, a visual app builder, or unconstrained cloud-agent usage.
Key Differences
Workflow
Augment Code is an enterprise-focused AI coding platform for teams working in large repositories, existing IDEs, terminals, and automated engineering workflows.
JetBrains AI is an IDE-native AI coding assistant and agent layer for JetBrains IDEs, positioned as an integrated alternative to standalone AI editors and generic coding extensions.
compare.fields.editorBase
VS Code
JetBrains
Pricing
paid
freemium
compare.fields.localModels
No
Yes
BYOK
No
Yes
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Augment Code | JetBrains AI |
|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | Augment Code is an enterprise-focused AI coding platform for teams working in large repositories, existing IDEs, terminals, and automated engineering workflows. | JetBrains AI is an IDE-native AI coding assistant and agent layer for JetBrains IDEs, positioned as an integrated alternative to standalone AI editors and generic coding extensions. |
| Type | code-assistant | extension |
| Editor base | VS Code | JetBrains |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | $100 | $10 |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Local models | No | Yes |
| BYOK | No | Yes |
| Platforms | VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Vim, Neovim, CLI, Browser-based Cosmos cloud agent platform, GitHub, Slack, Linear | IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, Rider, GoLand, PhpStorm, CLion, RubyMine, RustRover, DataGrip, DataSpell, Android Studio, ReSharper, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Models | Claude Fable 5, Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Opus 4.5, Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.1, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Kimi K2.6, Prism | Claude 4.7 Opus, Claude 4.6 Opus, Claude 4.6 Sonnet, Claude 4.5 Sonnet, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-5.5, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.3 Codex, GPT-5-Codex, GPT-5, GPT-4.1, GPT-4o, o3, o4-mini, Grok-4.3, Ollama, LM Studio, OpenAI-compatible providers |
| Enterprise features | SSO, OIDC, SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, Security reports, CMEK, ISO 42001 compliance, SIEM integration, Data residency options, Granular access controls, Comprehensive audit trails, Custom usage, Custom top-ups, Unlimited users, Multi-region compute, Custom size compute, Unlimited concurrent sessions, Dedicated support, Usage analytics, Advanced code review analytics, User allowlists, Multi-org GitHub support, Unlimited seats and repositories for enterprise code review | AI Enterprise tier through JetBrains IDE Services, Centralized license and quota management, Organization-level top-up AI Credits, JetBrains Account administration, BYOK configuration, Local model configuration, MCP Server controls, Exposed tool management for MCP, Enterprise support and custom features |
| Best for | Enterprise engineering teams, Large monorepos, Production refactors, Repository-scale debugging, Teams that want AI agents inside existing IDEs, Teams using JetBrains who do not want to switch to a VS Code fork, Cloud agent automation, AI-assisted code review, Migration and modernization projects, Incident investigation and security remediation workflows | JetBrains IDE users who want AI inside their existing editor workflow, Java, Kotlin, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, .NET, Go, PHP, Ruby, Rust, C/C++, SQL, and data developers, Teams that rely on JetBrains inspections, refactoring, run configurations, and debugging tools, Developers who want both code assistant features and agentic coding through Junie, Organizations that want BYOK, local model, and MCP-based AI workflow options |
| Not best for | Solo developers looking for the cheapest autocomplete tool, Users who want a full standalone AI IDE replacement, Teams requiring fully local model execution, Workflows that need BYOK model routing as a core documented feature, Projects where usage-based AI billing is unacceptable, Users whose main need is simple line-by-line code completion on a low-cost plan | Developers who primarily use VS Code and do not want to move into JetBrains IDEs, Teams looking for a browser-based AI app builder or prompt-to-app platform, Workflows that require unlimited cloud agent usage without credit-based quotas, Organizations in unsupported territories or environments where cloud LLM processing is not allowed, Users who want a fully open-source AI coding assistant |
Use Case Winners
Augment Code is built around a VS Code editor workflow.
JetBrains AI supports local model workflows.
Augment Code lists more team or enterprise controls.
JetBrains AI has stronger frontend or web workflow signals.
JetBrains AI supports more model/provider options or BYOK-style workflows.
Neither tool shows a strong signal for this use case in the current structured data.
Pricing Comparison
Augment Code
- Business$100 / month
Flat monthly plan for up to 50 seats with $100/month of usage included across LLM, Context Engine, and Cosmos compute.
- EnterpriseCustom
Custom usage, unlimited users, advanced security, SSO/OIDC/SCIM, compliance options, multi-region compute, and dedicated support.
JetBrains AI
- AI Free$0 / month
Free tier with limited AI Credits and access to selected JetBrains AI features.
- AI Pro$10 / user/month
Regular AI-assisted coding, AI chat, and limited agent usage with 10 AI Credits per 30 days.
- AI Ultimate$30 / user/month
Higher quota for frequent coding-agent usage with 35 AI Credits per 30 days.
- AI EnterpriseCustom
Enterprise tier for organizations using JetBrains IDE Services with additional administration and custom features.
- Top-up AI CreditsUsage-based
Optional AI Credit top-ups for eligible paid plans when monthly quota is exhausted.
Privacy & Security
Augment Code
Augment states that paid plans do not allow AI training on customer data. The platform processes codebase context, prompts, model requests, repository metadata, tool calls, and cloud-agent session data to provide its Context Engine, IDE clients, CLI, Cosmos, and automation features. Enterprise buyers should review the Trust Center, data residency, CMEK, audit trail, SIEM, and access-control options before using it with regulated or highly confidential code.
JetBrains AI
JetBrains AI features may send prompts, selected code, file types, framework information, and other necessary context to LLM providers. JetBrains documentation says detailed AI feature usage data collection is opt-in, disabled by default, kept confidential, and not shared externally. Teams handling sensitive code should review JetBrains data handling, BYOK, local model, and enterprise controls before rollout.
Choose Augment Code if...
- Enterprise engineering teams
- Large monorepos
- Production refactors
- Repository-scale debugging
- Teams that want AI agents inside existing IDEs
Choose JetBrains AI if...
- JetBrains IDE users who want AI inside their existing editor workflow
- Java, Kotlin, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, .NET, Go, PHP, Ruby, Rust, C/C++, SQL, and data developers
- Teams that rely on JetBrains inspections, refactoring, run configurations, and debugging tools
- Developers who want both code assistant features and agentic coding through Junie
- Organizations that want BYOK, local model, and MCP-based AI workflow options
Avoid Augment Code if...
- Solo developers looking for the cheapest autocomplete tool
- Users who want a full standalone AI IDE replacement
- Teams requiring fully local model execution
- Workflows that need BYOK model routing as a core documented feature
- Projects where usage-based AI billing is unacceptable
Avoid JetBrains AI if...
- Developers who primarily use VS Code and do not want to move into JetBrains IDEs
- Teams looking for a browser-based AI app builder or prompt-to-app platform
- Workflows that require unlimited cloud agent usage without credit-based quotas
- Organizations in unsupported territories or environments where cloud LLM processing is not allowed
- Users who want a fully open-source AI coding assistant