Augment Code vs Gemini Code Assist
Compare Augment Code and Gemini Code Assist by workflow, pricing, privacy, model support, and best use cases.
Augment Code
Choose Augment Code when the main problem is applying AI to large, real-world codebases without forcing developers to abandon their current IDEs. It is less attractive as a cheap personal autocomplete tool, but strong for teams that value deep context, cloud agents, code review, automation, and enterprise controls.
Gemini Code Assist
Gemini Code Assist is a strong choice for teams that want AI coding assistance inside existing IDEs while staying aligned with Google Cloud, Gemini CLI, GitHub review, and enterprise admin workflows. It is less suitable for developers who need local model control, BYOK flexibility, or a standalone AI editor experience.
Key Differences
Workflow
Augment Code is an enterprise-focused AI coding platform for teams working in large repositories, existing IDEs, terminals, and automated engineering workflows.
Gemini Code Assist is Google’s AI coding assistant for IDEs, GitHub, Gemini CLI, and Google Cloud workflows, positioned as a business-friendly alternative to Copilot, Cursor, and terminal coding agents.
Pricing
paid
freemium
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Augment Code | Gemini Code Assist |
|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | Augment Code is an enterprise-focused AI coding platform for teams working in large repositories, existing IDEs, terminals, and automated engineering workflows. | Gemini Code Assist is Google’s AI coding assistant for IDEs, GitHub, Gemini CLI, and Google Cloud workflows, positioned as a business-friendly alternative to Copilot, Cursor, and terminal coding agents. |
| Type | code-assistant | extension |
| Editor base | VS Code | VS Code |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | $100 | $22.8 |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Local models | No | No |
| BYOK | No | No |
| Platforms | VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Vim, Neovim, CLI, Browser-based Cosmos cloud agent platform, GitHub, Slack, Linear | VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, GoLand, WebStorm, Android Studio, Cloud Shell Editor, Cloud Workstations, GitHub, Gemini CLI, Google Cloud, Firebase, Cloud Run, BigQuery, Apigee, Application Integration |
| Models | Claude Fable 5, Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Opus 4.5, Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.1, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Kimi K2.6, Prism | Gemini 3, Gemini 2.5 |
| Enterprise features | SSO, OIDC, SCIM, SOC 2 Type II, Security reports, CMEK, ISO 42001 compliance, SIEM integration, Data residency options, Granular access controls, Comprehensive audit trails, Custom usage, Custom top-ups, Unlimited users, Multi-region compute, Custom size compute, Unlimited concurrent sessions, Dedicated support, Usage analytics, Advanced code review analytics, User allowlists, Multi-org GitHub support, Unlimited seats and repositories for enterprise code review | Enterprise-grade security, Gen AI indemnification for code suggestions, Code customization from private repositories, Usage metrics and observability dashboard, Google Cloud admin and billing controls, VPC Service Controls configuration, Gemini Code Assist logging configuration, GitHub enterprise code review setup, Google Cloud service integrations, Increased agent usage in Enterprise, Integration with Apigee and Application Integration, Additional Gemini Cloud Assist features |
| Best for | Enterprise engineering teams, Large monorepos, Production refactors, Repository-scale debugging, Teams that want AI agents inside existing IDEs, Teams using JetBrains who do not want to switch to a VS Code fork, Cloud agent automation, AI-assisted code review, Migration and modernization projects, Incident investigation and security remediation workflows | Developers using VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Android Studio, or Google Cloud workstations, Teams building on Google Cloud, Firebase, Cloud Run, BigQuery, Apigee, or Application Integration, Organizations that want managed AI coding assistance with enterprise security and Google Cloud administration, Teams that want IDE assistance plus terminal workflows through Gemini CLI, Enterprises that need code customization based on private repositories and organization coding style |
| Not best for | Solo developers looking for the cheapest autocomplete tool, Users who want a full standalone AI IDE replacement, Teams requiring fully local model execution, Workflows that need BYOK model routing as a core documented feature, Projects where usage-based AI billing is unacceptable, Users whose main need is simple line-by-line code completion on a low-cost plan | Users looking for a fully open-source coding assistant, Developers who need local model support or BYOK routing inside the IDE assistant, Teams outside the Google Cloud ecosystem that want minimal cloud admin setup, Users who want a standalone AI-native editor like Cursor or Windsurf, Developers relying on the unpaid individual IDE extension for long-term usage after the Antigravity migration |
Use Case Winners
Both Augment Code and Gemini Code Assist have comparable signals here.
Both Augment Code and Gemini Code Assist have comparable signals here.
Augment Code lists more team or enterprise controls.
Both Augment Code and Gemini Code Assist have comparable signals here.
Augment Code supports more model/provider options or BYOK-style workflows.
Neither tool shows a strong signal for this use case in the current structured data.
Pricing Comparison
Augment Code
- Business$100 / month
Flat monthly plan for up to 50 seats with $100/month of usage included across LLM, Context Engine, and Cosmos compute.
- EnterpriseCustom
Custom usage, unlimited users, advanced security, SSO/OIDC/SCIM, compliance options, multi-region compute, and dedicated support.
Gemini Code Assist
- Gemini Code Assist for individuals$0 / month
Free version for eligible personal Gmail accounts; Google notes unpaid IDE extension access is being replaced by Antigravity on June 18, 2026.
- Standard Monthly$22.80 / user/month
Business plan with IDE code assistance, local codebase awareness, code transformation, agent mode, Gemini CLI, and enterprise-grade security.
- Standard Annual$19 / user/month
Annual commitment pricing with upfront annual commitment.
- Enterprise Monthly$54 / user/month
Adds code customization, expanded Google Cloud integrations, and increased agent usage.
- Enterprise Annual$45 / user/month
Annual commitment pricing with upfront annual commitment.
Privacy & Security
Augment Code
Augment states that paid plans do not allow AI training on customer data. The platform processes codebase context, prompts, model requests, repository metadata, tool calls, and cloud-agent session data to provide its Context Engine, IDE clients, CLI, Cosmos, and automation features. Enterprise buyers should review the Trust Center, data residency, CMEK, audit trail, SIEM, and access-control options before using it with regulated or highly confidential code.
Gemini Code Assist
Gemini Code Assist Standard and Enterprise documentation says Google does not use customer data to train models without permission. Gemini Code Assist for individuals has a separate privacy notice and may use data to improve Google machine learning models unless the user opts out. Teams should review edition-specific privacy notices, administrator controls, repository access, code customization settings, GitHub app permissions, and Google Cloud data governance before rollout.
Choose Augment Code if...
- Enterprise engineering teams
- Large monorepos
- Production refactors
- Repository-scale debugging
- Teams that want AI agents inside existing IDEs
Choose Gemini Code Assist if...
- Developers using VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Android Studio, or Google Cloud workstations
- Teams building on Google Cloud, Firebase, Cloud Run, BigQuery, Apigee, or Application Integration
- Organizations that want managed AI coding assistance with enterprise security and Google Cloud administration
- Teams that want IDE assistance plus terminal workflows through Gemini CLI
- Enterprises that need code customization based on private repositories and organization coding style
Avoid Augment Code if...
- Solo developers looking for the cheapest autocomplete tool
- Users who want a full standalone AI IDE replacement
- Teams requiring fully local model execution
- Workflows that need BYOK model routing as a core documented feature
- Projects where usage-based AI billing is unacceptable
Avoid Gemini Code Assist if...
- Users looking for a fully open-source coding assistant
- Developers who need local model support or BYOK routing inside the IDE assistant
- Teams outside the Google Cloud ecosystem that want minimal cloud admin setup
- Users who want a standalone AI-native editor like Cursor or Windsurf
- Developers relying on the unpaid individual IDE extension for long-term usage after the Antigravity migration