Devin vs OpenHands
Compare Devin and OpenHands by workflow, pricing, privacy, model support, and best use cases.
Devin
Choose Devin when the goal is to delegate well-scoped engineering work to autonomous cloud agents and review resulting pull requests, tests, and artifacts later. Choose a local AI IDE or CLI agent when the task requires tight interactive control, cheaper short edits, local model support, or provider-neutral model routing.
OpenHands
OpenHands is a strong choice for developers and teams that want a transparent, configurable autonomous coding agent with local, cloud, and self-hosted deployment paths. It is less suitable for users who only need lightweight autocomplete or do not want agents executing code and commands in a sandbox.
Key Differences
Workflow
Devin is an autonomous AI software engineer for delegating real engineering tasks to cloud and desktop agents that work across repositories, tickets, pull requests, shells, browsers, and team tools.
OpenHands is an open-source autonomous coding-agent platform for developers and teams that want model-agnostic agents capable of executing real software engineering tasks across local, cloud, and self-hosted environments.
compare.fields.localModels
No
Yes
BYOK
No
Yes
compare.fields.openSource
No
Yes
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Devin | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | Devin is an autonomous AI software engineer for delegating real engineering tasks to cloud and desktop agents that work across repositories, tickets, pull requests, shells, browsers, and team tools. | OpenHands is an open-source autonomous coding-agent platform for developers and teams that want model-agnostic agents capable of executing real software engineering tasks across local, cloud, and self-hosted environments. |
| Type | code-assistant | code-assistant |
| Editor base | Standalone | Standalone |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Local models | No | Yes |
| BYOK | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web app, Devin Cloud, Devin Desktop, Devin CLI, Devin API, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Linear, Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Dedicated enterprise deployment, VPC-connected enterprise environments | Browser, CLI, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Jira, Linear, Kubernetes, Private cloud, Self-hosted infrastructure |
| Models | SWE 1.6, OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, leading open source models | OpenHands, Anthropic, OpenAI, Mistral AI, Gemini, Google Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, LiteLLM, Ollama, LM Studio |
| Enterprise features | Enterprise plan, Dedicated deployment option, Customer-isolated environment, AWS PrivateLink support, IPSec tunnel support, SAML SSO, OIDC SSO, RBAC, IdP group integration, Centralized enterprise admin controls, Teamspace isolation, Dedicated account management, Dedicated account and engineering support, Custom terms, Enterprise billing through Agent Compute Units, GitHub Enterprise Server support through private networking, GitLab and Bitbucket private infrastructure support, Artifactory and Nexus private infrastructure support, Trust Center security documentation | Self-hosted deployment, Private VPC deployment, Kubernetes deployment, Enterprise SAML/SSO, Multi-user RBAC, Organization support, Centralized team billing, Cloud APIs, Jira integration, Slack integration, Large Codebase SDK, Unlimited concurrent conversations per user, Priority support, Ticket-based support, Named customer engineer, Shared Slack channel |
| Best for | Engineering teams with large backlogs, Parallel task delegation, Bug reproduction and fixing, Feature implementation drafts, Code migrations, Framework upgrades, Monorepo refactors, Unit test generation, Documentation maintenance, PR review workflows, Internal tool building, Customer engineering support, Teams that want background agents producing reviewable pull requests | Developers who want an open-source autonomous coding agent they can run locally, Teams assigning GitHub issues, bugs, refactors, tests, and documentation tasks to agents, Organizations that need model flexibility through BYOK, LiteLLM, or local models, Platform teams building internal coding-agent workflows with SDKs and APIs, Enterprises that need self-hosted or private-cloud coding agents with governance and auditability |
| Not best for | Developers who only need fast autocomplete, Teams that cannot grant agents repository or tool access, Highly sensitive production systems without sandboxing and review gates, Users who need local model execution, Users who want provider-neutral BYOK model routing, Non-technical prompt-to-app builders who do not want to review code, Small tasks where a local IDE assistant or CLI agent is faster and cheaper | Developers who only want inline autocomplete inside an existing IDE, Teams that are not ready to review agent-generated code and pull requests carefully, Users who want a zero-configuration cloud IDE or visual app builder, Organizations that cannot allow agents to execute commands in sandboxed environments, Very small tasks where a lightweight chat assistant or IDE extension is faster |
Use Case Winners
Devin is built around a Standalone editor workflow.
OpenHands supports local model workflows.
Devin lists more team or enterprise controls.
OpenHands has stronger frontend or web workflow signals.
OpenHands supports more model/provider options or BYOK-style workflows.
OpenHands is marked as open source.
Pricing Comparison
Devin
- Free$0 / month
Light quota to code with agents, limited model availability, unlimited inline edits, and unlimited Tab completions.
- Pro$20 / month
Adds increased quotas, full model availability, access to OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini frontier models, free SWE 1.6 usage, and Devin Cloud.
- Max$200 / month
Higher individual quota for power users, including everything in Pro with significantly more usage.
- Teams$80 + $40/full dev seat / month
Team plan with unlimited team members, collaboration, centralized billing, admin analytics, and priority support.
- EnterpriseCustom
Enterprise plan with custom terms, dedicated account team, SAML/OIDC SSO, centralized admin controls, teamspace isolation, and dedicated deployment options.
OpenHands
- Open Source$0 / month
MIT-licensed local OpenHands with web GUI, terminal UI, CLI, Git integrations, and model-agnostic LLM configuration.
- Individual$0 / month
Hosted OpenHands Cloud for one user with BYOK or OpenHands LLM provider access at cost; includes hosted access, API support, Jira, and Slack integrations.
- OpenHands LLM ProviderUsage-based
Optional pay-as-you-go LLM access at cost when not using your own model key.
- EnterpriseCustom
SaaS or self-hosted deployment with unlimited users, SAML/SSO, RBAC, large codebase SDK, priority support, and private VPC options.
Privacy & Security
Devin
Devin can process prompts, repository content, shell output, browser activity, issue or ticket data, pull request context, secrets made available through configured tools, knowledge sources, and integration metadata. Enterprise customers can evaluate dedicated deployment, AWS PrivateLink or IPSec private networking, SAML/OIDC SSO, RBAC, and teamspace isolation. Teams should scope permissions narrowly, separate production credentials from agent environments, review generated changes before merge, and avoid giving cloud agents unnecessary access to sensitive systems or data.
OpenHands
OpenHands can run locally with a user-provided LLM key, through OpenHands Cloud, or as an enterprise self-hosted deployment. Local and enterprise deployments give teams more control over code, conversations, runtime, and model routing, while cloud usage depends on OpenHands Cloud configuration and connected providers. Teams should review model-provider policies, repository permissions, secrets, sandbox settings, logs, and audit requirements before using it with sensitive code.
Choose Devin if...
- Engineering teams with large backlogs
- Parallel task delegation
- Bug reproduction and fixing
- Feature implementation drafts
- Code migrations
Choose OpenHands if...
- Developers who want an open-source autonomous coding agent they can run locally
- Teams assigning GitHub issues, bugs, refactors, tests, and documentation tasks to agents
- Organizations that need model flexibility through BYOK, LiteLLM, or local models
- Platform teams building internal coding-agent workflows with SDKs and APIs
- Enterprises that need self-hosted or private-cloud coding agents with governance and auditability
Avoid Devin if...
- Developers who only need fast autocomplete
- Teams that cannot grant agents repository or tool access
- Highly sensitive production systems without sandboxing and review gates
- Users who need local model execution
- Users who want provider-neutral BYOK model routing
Avoid OpenHands if...
- Developers who only want inline autocomplete inside an existing IDE
- Teams that are not ready to review agent-generated code and pull requests carefully
- Users who want a zero-configuration cloud IDE or visual app builder
- Organizations that cannot allow agents to execute commands in sandboxed environments
- Very small tasks where a lightweight chat assistant or IDE extension is faster