CodeSandbox vs Eclipse Che
Compare CodeSandbox and Eclipse Che by workflow, pricing, privacy, model support, and best use cases.
CodeSandbox
Choose CodeSandbox when you need shareable cloud development environments, collaborative browser coding, or scalable sandbox infrastructure for AI agents and code execution. Choose StackBlitz for browser-native WebContainers, GitHub Codespaces or Gitpod for container-native repo workflows, and Replit or Bolt.new when prompt-to-app AI building is the priority.
Eclipse Che
Eclipse Che is a strong choice for organizations that want open-source, Kubernetes-native, browser-based developer workspaces with enterprise control. It is less suitable for teams that want a fully managed SaaS IDE, built-in AI coding, or a low-operations setup.
Key Differences
Workflow
CodeSandbox is a cloud development environment and sandbox infrastructure platform for browser coding, collaborative development, and programmatic code execution at scale.
Eclipse Che is an open-source Kubernetes-native cloud development environment platform for teams that want centrally managed, browser-based, reproducible developer workspaces.
Pricing
freemium
open-source
compare.fields.openSource
No
Yes
Feature Comparison
| Feature | CodeSandbox | Eclipse Che |
|---|---|---|
| Primary workflow | CodeSandbox is a cloud development environment and sandbox infrastructure platform for browser coding, collaborative development, and programmatic code execution at scale. | Eclipse Che is an open-source Kubernetes-native cloud development environment platform for teams that want centrally managed, browser-based, reproducible developer workspaces. |
| Type | resource | framework |
| Editor base | Browser | Browser |
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Local models | No | No |
| BYOK | No | No |
| Platforms | Web browser, VS Code extension, iOS app, CodeSandbox SDK, Browser Sandboxes, VM Sandboxes, GitHub repositories, Storybook, Sandpack | Browser, Kubernetes, OpenShift, AWS EKS, Azure AKS, Google Kubernetes Engine, Minikube, vCluster, Visual Studio Code - Open Source, JetBrains IDEs, Open VSX |
| Models | Unknown | Unknown |
| Enterprise features | Enterprise plan, Unlimited members, Custom VM specs up to 64 vCPUs and 128 GiB RAM, Bespoke concurrent VM limits, Custom hourly request limits, Dedicated support, SOC 2 Type II compliance, Optional SSO, Dedicated cluster option, Private projects, Private npm registry support, Live sessions, Custom deployment discussions through Together AI | Kubernetes and OpenShift deployment, OIDC authentication, OpenShift OAuth and Dex integration, Kubernetes RBAC authorization, Multi-user workspace management, Restricted and air-gapped installation support, Standalone Open VSX registry support, CheCluster custom resource configuration, Prometheus and Grafana monitoring integration, Workspace isolation through Kubernetes namespaces and pods |
| Best for | Browser-based coding, Frontend prototypes, React, Vue, Angular, and JavaScript experiments, Runnable documentation, Teaching and workshops, Pair programming, Bug reproductions, Storybook component playgrounds, AI agent code execution, Code interpreter infrastructure, Development environments at scale, Teams that need shareable cloud workspaces | Enterprise teams standardizing development environments on Kubernetes or OpenShift, Organizations replacing local workstation setup with centralized browser-based workspaces, Platform engineering teams building cloud development environments, Teams that want devfile-based, version-controlled workspace definitions, Projects that benefit from production-like development runtimes inside Kubernetes pods |
| Not best for | Developers who primarily need AI autocomplete, Users looking for a prompt-to-app product builder, Teams that require fully local development, Organizations that want fixed monthly IDE pricing with no usage-based VM credits, Very large production monorepos without careful VM sizing and cost planning, Workflows requiring a full AI-native code editor experience | Small teams that want a simple managed IDE with no Kubernetes operations, Developers looking for an AI coding assistant or prompt-to-app builder, Teams that do not use containers, Kubernetes, OpenShift, or devfile workflows, Organizations without capacity to manage storage, networking, OIDC, RBAC, upgrades, and cluster sizing, Solo developers who mainly need lightweight local development |
Use Case Winners
Both CodeSandbox and Eclipse Che have comparable signals here.
Both CodeSandbox and Eclipse Che have comparable signals here.
CodeSandbox lists more team or enterprise controls.
CodeSandbox has stronger frontend or web workflow signals.
Neither tool shows a strong signal for this use case in the current structured data.
Eclipse Che is marked as open source.
Pricing Comparison
CodeSandbox
- Build$0 / month
Free plan for learning and experimenting, with 5 members, monthly VM credits, private sandboxes, VS Code extension, and limited SDK usage.
- Scale$170 / workspace/month
Usage-based subscription with up to 20 members, higher monthly VM credits, on-demand VM credits, CodeSandbox SDK, more VM tiers, and higher concurrency limits.
- EnterpriseCustom
Custom deployment with unlimited members, bespoke concurrency, higher VM specs, dedicated support, SOC 2 Type II compliance, optional SSO, and dedicated cluster options.
- VM Credits$0.015 / credit
VM credits are used for VM Sandbox runtime; credit usage depends on VM size and runtime.
- Education / Open Source / Non-profitDiscounted
Special conditions and free or low-cost access for eligible education, open-source, community, and non-profit projects.
Eclipse Che
- Open Source$0 / month
Eclipse Che is free and open source under the Eclipse Public License 2.0.
- Self-Hosted InfrastructureUsage-based
You provide and pay for Kubernetes, OpenShift, storage, networking, identity, and compute resources.
- Hosted Trial / Samples$0
Public sample workspaces may be available through Red Hat-hosted OpenShift workspaces, subject to availability and account requirements.
Privacy & Security
CodeSandbox
CodeSandbox runs projects in browser or VM sandboxes depending on environment type. VM Sandboxes execute code in isolated environments and may involve repository content, terminals, package installs, previews, environment variables, and collaboration sessions. Teams should avoid exposing secrets in public sandboxes, configure project privacy, review GitHub and npm permissions, and evaluate Enterprise or dedicated-cluster options for sensitive or regulated workloads.
Eclipse Che
Eclipse Che is typically self-hosted on infrastructure controlled by the organization. Source code, workspace containers, credentials, logs, and runtime data are governed by the chosen Kubernetes or OpenShift cluster, storage backend, identity provider, RBAC policies, and extension registry configuration. Teams should review cluster access, namespace isolation, secrets handling, image provenance, Open VSX registry policy, and log retention before rollout.
Choose CodeSandbox if...
- Browser-based coding
- Frontend prototypes
- React, Vue, Angular, and JavaScript experiments
- Runnable documentation
- Teaching and workshops
Choose Eclipse Che if...
- Enterprise teams standardizing development environments on Kubernetes or OpenShift
- Organizations replacing local workstation setup with centralized browser-based workspaces
- Platform engineering teams building cloud development environments
- Teams that want devfile-based, version-controlled workspace definitions
- Projects that benefit from production-like development runtimes inside Kubernetes pods
Avoid CodeSandbox if...
- Developers who primarily need AI autocomplete
- Users looking for a prompt-to-app product builder
- Teams that require fully local development
- Organizations that want fixed monthly IDE pricing with no usage-based VM credits
- Very large production monorepos without careful VM sizing and cost planning
Avoid Eclipse Che if...
- Small teams that want a simple managed IDE with no Kubernetes operations
- Developers looking for an AI coding assistant or prompt-to-app builder
- Teams that do not use containers, Kubernetes, OpenShift, or devfile workflows
- Organizations without capacity to manage storage, networking, OIDC, RBAC, upgrades, and cluster sizing
- Solo developers who mainly need lightweight local development